Prospects to Generate Waterspouts to Increase Hydroelectric Power
Rainfall depends on the hydrological cycle, where the sun heats land and sea unevenly to cause wind. During the day, the land heats faster than the sea and warm air rises upward from land. The movement of the air causes cooler air to move from over the sea toward land. The classical theory holds that oceanic winds pick up moisture and humidity far offshore, especially from ocean spray generated by powerful winds at sea. As well, winds pick up much moisture along coastal regions from the spray from waves that break at or near the coast and that may evaporate from the warmer land surface.
In several regions internationally, variations in surface temperature produce cyclones that sometimes occur over warm water and become waterspouts. Waterspouts have been observed to form on Lake Michigan and Lake Ontario, including during winter months where the swirling wind picks up snow from the lake surface and is known as a snow devil. Snow devils have been observed to carry a massive volume of snow from the lakes to inland locations. Louis Michaud's research suggests that is may be possible to purposefully create the necessary conditions that would produce a swirling mass of air directly above water.
The swirling mass of air would create a spray of seawater at specially chosen stationary locations along the oceanic coast, then carry the spray to higher elevation where much of it would evaporate during warmer weather and through sublimation during periods of extreme dryness. Gravity would cause the higher salinity brine to fall back to the sea. Brine that falls on coastal land would undergo further evaporation and leave deposits of sea salt on the beaches. During the day, prevailing winds would carry the resulting humidity inland to watershed regions located at the higher elevations.
Thermal Energy:
Most North American coastal areas have access to 2-renewable sources of thermal energy: concentrated solar thermal energy and deep level low-grade geothermal energy. The 3rd option would be to source thermal energy from the waste heat from a seawater-cooled nuclear thermal power station. One means by which to access low-grade geothermal energy would be to drill into the earth bedrock at some 1500 offshore islands along the west coast of Quebec and similar offshore islands along the coasts of British Columbia,
Advances in the mining and exploration industries have developed methods by which to drill to great depths in the earth's bedrock and access low-grade geothermal energy that lies below the surface of most offshore islands. That technology may also be able to access deep level pockets of gravel and porous rock that occur in the bedrock that may then become saturated with seawater. There may be sufficient deep level geothermal energy at near 100°C that may heat the seawater that trickles to down to the lower elevations. That heated seawater would become the thermal energy source that could drive a waterspout generator.
The construction of a waterspout generator would comprise a tower built over a pond of heated seawater, perhaps at a purposefully excavated oceanic inlet. Angled air inlets built into the base of the tower would initiate the swirling movement of heated air that would rise upward from above the heated seawater. A submerged heat exchanger installed in the pond at the base of the generator or in the channel leading to it, would transfer heat into the seawater. Air directly above the heated pond would pick up heat and begin to rise upward.
As the heated air rises upward, replacement air would flow in through the angled air inlets at the base of the tower and swirl over the pond of heated seawater. It may also be preheated by ambient solar heat on the ground and surrounding water surface prior to flowing into the waterspout generator. Heat from the pond surface would accelerate the incoming swirling mass of air, producing small waves on the heated pond along with a spray of heated water. That swirling spray would form into a waterspout that would swirl upward into the atmosphere.
Much of the moisture in the swirling mass of spray would evaporate at higher elevation. Gravity would cause the high salinity brine to drop either into the sea or on to coastal land. Prevailing winds may carry evaporated moisture from the spray inland to the higher elevations where it may condense in the cooler air or on purposefully installed dew fences located over valleys. Much of the evaporated moisture produced by waterspout generators may occur as rain over the watershed regions of storage dams of Hydro Quebec, BC Hydro and several other hydroelectric utilities.
Conclusions:
Coastal winds would carry evaporated moisture from the waterspout spray and inland toward coastal mountains, where naturally occurring precipitation would add water to the hydroelectric reservoirs. There may be scope to install waterspout generators along the west coasts of Quebec and Mexico, where high salinity brine may fall to the earth along the desolate coastline while coastal winds carry the evaporated moisture inland. The installation of waterspout technology at various coastal locations around North America has the potential to create very highly localized micro-climatic zones.
However, the need for potable water may leave little alternative other than to develop such zones. Microclimates created by purposefully built waterspout generators may provide water for human consumption and for hydroelectric power generation, instead of a possible drought that may otherwise occur. Both Hydro Quebec and BC Hydro have indicated their interest in exporting additional hydroelectric power into American markets. The use of waterspout generators may enhance their ability to so in the future and especially during summer drought conditions.





Comments
I didn’t get very far but since I put in the time I’ll report and let others take over
At zero F air can hold very little water vapor. Specifically 0.000781pounds of water per pound of dry air or 1280 pounds of saturated air can hold but one pound of water. (No wonder we don’t get big snows in cold weather and that Antarctica is a desert.)
At 0 F and one atmo a pound of air occupies 11.58 cubic feet or it takes 148,200 cubic feet of saturated air per one pound of water. It took 1000 BTUs to evaporate this pound of water. If this heat came from the air (the blowing wind) and taking the specific heat of air to be 0.25 then the air was cooled 5 degrees to -5 F. But at – 5 F this amount of air cannot hold the amount of water vapor we started with at 0 F. We would need to iterate to close in. But the rigor of my calc does not justify it.
I am well aware of the “lake effect” snows east of lower Lake Michigan areas and places like Buffalo vs the west side of Lake Michigan aInd this post helps explain.
A vortex engine power station with a diameter of 100 m and a height of 50 m could generate 200 MW of electricity. The vortex could have a diameter of 30 m at its base and could extend to a height of up to 15 km. There could be 20 turbines around the base of the station each with a power output of 10 MW. The cost of the electricity would be less than half of the cost of the least expensive alternative and could be as low as $0.03/kWh.
The vortex engine has the same basis as the proven solar chimney which is simply a chimney surrounded by a greenhouse. The physical tube of the solar chimney is replaced with centrifugal force in the vortex. There is no need for the greenhouse; the solar collector is the earth’s surface in its unaltered state.
The heat source can be solar energy or waste heat. The solar heat can come from warm sea water. Hurricanes and water spouts use warm sea water at temperatures between 26 and 30°C as their heat source. Water at these temperatures is widely available in the tropics. Waste heat at 40 to 50°C is also widely available and can be warmer than sea water. There is no need to dig for geothermal heat which is only available is minute quantities compared with solar energy.
Building a working vortex engine will require careful design. Relying on the vortex to produce water spray is unlikely to work. Carrying out the heat exchange in a wet cooling tower would provide better control and would not require that station be on the coast.
I pointed out on the vortexengine.ca web site that a vortex engine could a small amount of precipitation which should be useful. A 200 MW atmospheric vortex engine (AVE) could produce 2 mm/day of precipitation over 10 square kilometer area; this is small compared to the precipitation produced by natural storms. The amount of precipitation would be smaller in cold climates.
The energy produced in a large hurricane is more than the energy produced by humans in a year. A mid size tornado produces as much energy as a large power plant.
Vortex engines would increase the efficiency of thermal power plants by reducing the cold source temperature from the temperature at the bottom of the atmosphere to the temperature at the tropopause. They would permit the use widely available of low temperature heat sources such as warm humid air.
Working 1 m and 4 m diameter vortex producing prototypes without the turbo-generators have been built. The technology just needs scaling up.
Vortex engines would not be dangerous. The air flow and the intensity of the vortex are limited by the size of the air entries. These openings can easily be closed with dampers. Without the spin large heat sources are not hazardous and without the tangential entries there is no spin.
Our quality of life is threatened by diminishing fuel reserves and by global warming. The atmospheric vortex engine harnesses the energy of the tornado process and can produce virtually unlimited quantities of clean energy.
More information on the atmospheric vortex engine is available on website:
vortexengine.ca