No Longer Lowly

Bill Opalka | Jun 22, 2010

Share/Save  

I start with the premise that solar cells and modules are the attention-getters in the photovoltaic (PV) component market and don't need much introduction. And when I'm at a trade show or event, it's more likely than not that the inverter manufacturers are the ones most anxiously saying some variation of "look at me."

So it seemed a little unusual when an industry report about inverters, no less, caught my attention.

But IDC Energy Insights did, with its "Vendor Assessment: Industry Short List for Utility-Scale Photovoltaic Inverters for the North American Market." I recently spoke to Sam Jaffe, research manager in IDC's Boulder office and a co-author of the report, which examines the top 10 vendors in the North American market.

In short, the inverter market is poised to take off, following the huge interest in utility-scale PV that is supposed to cause a massive build-out over the next few years.

"Thanks to dramatically decreasing production costs and price points, PV systems are more economical today than they ever have been," the report said. "But that decline has also caused the lowly inverter, once an afterthought in planning for any PV system, to become a more critical purchasing decision than ever before."

Jaffe said there are several reasons for this new-found status. "Two things are happening here in that before the inverter was never more than a dumb box in which direct current went in one end and alternating current came out the other.

"But basically now it is being turned into a computer. There are still those companies that, based on the economies of scale, will make the simple box to drive costs lower, and those who are adding functionality. So the market is becoming bifurcated."

But the market, is being served, as PV projects in the 10-megawatt to 50-megawatt range are being announced with some regularity.

The editorial staff at RenewablesBiz.com is passionate about exchanging ideas and dedicated to promoting ongoing conversation about renewables and sustainable energy issues.  We invite you to join and contribute to our online community. If you have an idea for an article or editorial contribution, please contact me via email, bopalka@energycentral.com, or phone, 860.633.0090.

Comments

software reliability

Let's hope inverter vendors select reliable hardware/software technolgies for failure of grid tie inverters could be serious and costly.

Damage to grid hardware is apparently possible?

What’s All This Smart Grid Stuff, Anyhow?
BOB PEASE

[N]ow we have the Smart Grid, and smart meters, for gas and electricity. In California, PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric, also known as Pigs, Greed & Extortion) has connected up to 3.3 million “smart meters,” which are presumably helping people save energy and money. In fact, 99.8% of these meters work fine. Just one leetle problem — more than 5400 customers have had terrible problems with bad meters. They read either much too high or too low. Whichever is the problem, PG&E sends out an estimated bill. Some of these bills are so absurd, the customers are enraged. PG&E apparently did not have any good plans to talk thoughtfully to customers, not any better than AT&T had. So gangs of outraged customers are protesting and marching on PG&E, equipped with pitchforks and torches.* Wouldn’t you be grouchy if you went on a month of vacation and came home to find a $236 bill for electricity, even though you’d turned out all the lights?

Did PG&E have no plans for the possibility that some meters might err? Who designed the meters? Who built the meters? Who ran the quality control on the meters? Who evaluated the meters after they were installed? Who planned the customer relations? Not me! Did these guys all assume that the “smart meters” had to work right because they were all-digital?

Do you trust the people who designed and put out these “smart meters” to run a complete “smart” power grid? I can’t answer any questions. But I am qualified to ask questions. ...

Our answer is, not if they used C and assembler.

http://www.prosefights.org/scriptpollute/siliconlabs/harvard.htm